Is the 90% reduction guaranteed?

No. Up to 90% is the target we design for, based on how much DevSecOps time goes to repeat requests. We measure your baseline in the pilot so you can see the real number for your team.

What access does it need?

Read-only access to the repos, pipelines, scanners and cloud accounts you choose. Write access, such as opening pull requests, is added per action and can be revoked at any time.

Can agents merge or grant access on their own?

Only where your policy allows it. Most teams start with agents proposing pull requests and access changes, then let them handle low-risk ones once the results have earned trust.

Where do developers ask for help?

Where they already do: Jira Service Management, ServiceNow, Slack or a comment on the pull request. Agents reply in the same thread.

AWS Partner

SOC 2 Reports

Frontier Resolutionfor DevSecOps

Cut up to 90% of the effort DevSecOps spends supporting developers.

Developers ask DevSecOps the same questions every day: why the pipeline failed, why the scan blocked the merge, who can grant access. Agents pick up each request, investigate it in your repos, pipelines and cloud accounts, and reply with the cause and a fix ready to merge. The goal is to take up to 90% of that support load off your DevSecOps team.

Book a Demo See how it works

Jira Service Management ticketfix ready

payments-service deploy blocked by security gate

Pipeline: GitHub Actions run 4812 failed at the Trivy scan step
Finding: CVE-2024-45337 in golang.org/x/crypto v0.29.0
Cause: Base image pins an old module the service still imports
Evidence: Scan report, go.sum diff, image layers
Fix: Pull request bumping to v0.31.0. Tests pass on the branch

Resolved in 3m 40s. Waiting for developer review

[The work behind every developer request]

Developers ship faster every quarter.The DevSecOps queue grows with them.

01The manual work

Unblock

A ticket is only the start. DevSecOps still reads the pipeline log, reruns the scan, checks the policy and explains the fix.

02The agent handoff

Fix ready

Frontier agents investigate the request across code, pipeline and cloud, then prepare a pull request or an access change for review.

03Your engineers’ role

Approve

Set the guardrails once. Review the proposed change and keep your time for platform work and real security risk.

[Where CloudThinker fits]

Your stack stays.Agents work inside it.

01Developer requests

Where the queue starts

GitHub ActionsFailed pipelines and blocked deploys
GitLab CIMerge request pipelines
Azure DevOpsPipelines and work items
JenkinsLegacy build jobs
Jira Service ManagementDevSecOps tickets

No change to your pipelines

02Security gates

Your system of record

SonarQubeQuality and security gates
SnykDependency and container findings
TrivyImage scans in CI
VaultSecrets and policies
TerraformInfrastructure as code

Policy stays yours

03Resolution

CloudThinker

Read the failurePipeline log, scan report and policy
Find the causeThe dependency, image or rule behind it
Prepare the fixPull request or access change
Explain itA plain answer the developer can act on

Read-only by default

04Response

Answers, not tickets

GitHubPull request with tests passing
SlackAnswer posted to the developer
Microsoft TeamsApprove from the thread
JiraTicket closed with the evidence

Changes merge on approval

Logos show common stacks. CloudThinker connects to each one through read-only access you approve.

[Example scenario]

Wednesday, 11:20. A release is blocked.Twelve tickets are ahead of it.

A 90-developer payments company on GitHub Actions and EKS. Three DevSecOps engineers, a security gate on every pipeline, and a queue that never empties.

11:20
Developer opens a ticketSignal
Jira: "payments-service deploy blocked by security gate, need this out today." Thirteenth in the queue.
11:20
Agent picks it upAgent
Reads GitHub Actions run 4812, the Trivy report, the go.sum file and the base image layers.
11:22
Cause foundAgent
CVE-2024-45337 in golang.org/x/crypto v0.29.0. The service still imports it through an old pin in the base image.
11:23
Fix opened as a PRAgent
Bumps the module to v0.31.0 and refreshes the base image. Tests and the Trivy scan pass on the branch.
11:31
Developer mergesYour team
The developer reviews a one-line change with the scan result attached, merges and redeploys.
11:40
Ticket closed with a lessonAgent
Deploy passes the gate. Ticket closed, and 4 other services with the same pin get the same PR.

DEVSEC-22914 messages

Developer11:20
Security gate blocks payments-service again. Can someone look? Need it out today.
CloudThinker11:23
Cause: CVE-2024-45337 in golang.org/x/crypto v0.29.0, pulled in by the base image pin. PR #8812 bumps to v0.31.0. Tests and Trivy pass on the branch.
Developer11:31
Merged, redeploying.
CloudThinker11:40
Gate passed, deploy live. Same pin found in 4 more services, PRs opened. Closing this ticket.

from ticket to live deploy: 20 min
DevSecOps engineers pulled in: 0
more services fixed before they broke: 4

An illustrative example. Team, systems and times are representative, not a specific customer.

[Frontier resolution agents]

Every request gets an answer.Only the hard ones reach your team.

Agents work the DevSecOps queue on the same policy your team already enforces, so a developer gets an answer in minutes, and your engineers get their week back.

Debug failed pipelines: Build, test and deploy failures traced to the step, the change and the config that broke them.
Fix blocked merges: Scanner findings that block a merge turned into a pull request with the fix and passing tests.
Handle access requests: Access and secret requests checked against policy, then granted with least privilege and an expiry.
Answer the repeat questions: How do I rotate this key, why is this port closed, which image is approved. Answered from your own runbooks.

[What changes]

Same team. Same tools.Far less of the work by hand.

Moment	Today	With frontier agents
Developer waits for help	Until someone on DevSecOps is free	Minutes after the ticket is filed
Failed pipelines	Debugged by hand from the logs	Traced to the step and change that broke it
Blocked merges	A Slack thread about the scanner	A pull request with the fix and passing tests
Access requests	Granted broadly to clear the queue	Least privilege with an expiry, every time
DevSecOps time	Spent answering the same questions	Spent on platform and real security risk

[Integrations]

Connects to the rest of your stack.Read-only to start.

GitHub
GitLab
GitHub Actions
Jenkins
Argo CD
Terraform
Snyk
Semgrep
SonarQube
Trivy
Checkov
Vault
Okta
Jira Service Management
Slack

[Adoption path]

One pilot.Then company-wide.

The rollout follows the four phases of the AWS Cloud Adoption Framework, so it fits the plan your cloud team already runs.

01Envision
Pick one request type
Start with failed pipelines or blocked merges, read-only. Compare the agents’ answers with what your team would have sent.
02Align
Agree the guardrails
Decide which fixes agents may open as pull requests, which access they may grant, and who approves.
03Launch
Open it to every team
Route each team’s DevSecOps requests through agents on the same policies and audit trail.
04Scale
Make it the front door
New repos and pipelines launch with agent support on. Every resolved request feeds your runbooks.

[Customer proof]

FPT Cloud.Results on the record.

FPT Cloud put CloudThinker AI Code Review on live merge requests and caught the defects observable in the code, security findings included, before human review or QC.

Read the case study

precision on production merge requests: ~97%
backend logic coverage: Full

[AWS guidance]

Built the way AWS says to run it.Reviews start from a known reference.

[Trust and control]

Agents do the work.Your team keeps control.

You approve every change: Agents propose. Nothing touches production until someone on your team says yes, and you set that rule per system.
Every action on the record: Each step is logged, attributed and reversible, ready for your auditors.
Certified for enterprise: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 42001, with reports in our trust center.
Runs where you need it: In our cloud, through AWS Marketplace, or inside your own account.

[Questions]

What teams askbefore they start.

Is the 90% reduction guaranteed?: No. Up to 90% is the target we design for, based on how much DevSecOps time goes to repeat requests. We measure your baseline in the pilot so you can see the real number for your team.
What access does it need?: Read-only access to the repos, pipelines, scanners and cloud accounts you choose. Write access, such as opening pull requests, is added per action and can be revoked at any time.
Can agents merge or grant access on their own?: Only where your policy allows it. Most teams start with agents proposing pull requests and access changes, then let them handle low-risk ones once the results have earned trust.
Where do developers ask for help?: Where they already do: Jira Service Management, ServiceNow, Slack or a comment on the pull request. Agents reply in the same thread.

[Go deeper]